Ask HN: As a developer, am I wrong to think monitoring alerts are mostly noise?
I'm a solo developer working on a new tool, and I need a reality check from the ops and infrastructure experts here. My background is in software development, not SRE. From my perspective, the monitoring alerts that bubble up from our infrastructure have always felt like a massive distraction. I'll get a page for "High CPU" on a service, spend an hour digging through logs and dashboards, only to find out it was just a temporary traffic spike and not a real issue. It feels like a huge waste of developer time. My hypothesis is that the tools we use are too focused on static thresholds (e.g., "CPU > 80%") and lack the context to tell us what's actually an anomaly. I've been exploring a different approach based on peer-group comparisons (e.g., is api-server-5 behaving differently from its peers api-server-1 through 4?). But I'm coming at this f
Why it failed
I'm a solo developer working on a new tool, and I need a reality check from the ops and infrastructure experts here. My background is in software development, not SRE. From my perspective, the monitoring alerts that bubble up from our infrastructure have always felt like a m
- Kind
- startup
- Status
- Shut down
- Inventor
- yansoki
- Ended
- 2025
- Source
- hackernews