I think this is the point that's really missing; that it isn't just the person and the environment need to match, as though the environme...
I think this is the point that's really missing; that it isn't just the person and the environment need to match, as though the environment is some immutable thing. As a manager, you have to notice when your "A" players are falling and change things if necessary. You can change the environment to make more "A" players out of your team. Though, sadly, more often management winds up making "B" players out of "A" players. Or making ex-employees out of them. By the way, there is a counter-argument. The true "A" players are go-getters who bring about organizational change, who seek out challenges in an unchallenging environment, etc. The "B" players aren't demotivated by bad management, a hostile environment, lack of freedom or respect - they're people who are just naturally unmotivated, lazy, etc. I hate that argument, of course. It suggests motivation and productivity is just some innate, immutable trait. And ultimately, it exists to excuse managerial failings.
Posted by JimboOmega on Sep 11, 2014, 8:15 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Near impossible to do it robustly without AI, since a mesh is a blob of triangles and vertices, it doesn't really know if something is a ...
- Because I learned on this, it made learning everything else that much harder.
- For the old school (I hate that that’s arguably applicable) AI dating types, and so on.
- > I hate that you are reducing my craft to just the end results and nothing else.
- > This of course is the cornerstone of Western culture and no well-educated person can be without a knowledge of what is in it.
- I hate that it's hidden too.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
complaint (EdTech)
Near impossible to do it robustly without AI, since a mesh is a blob of triangles and vertices, it doesn't really know if something is a ...
Because I learned on this, it made learning everything else that much harder.
For the old school (I hate that that’s arguably applicable) AI dating types, and so on.
> I hate that you are reducing my craft to just the end results and nothing else.
> This of course is the cornerstone of Western culture and no well-educated person can be without a knowledge of what is in it.
I hate that it's hidden too.
I think the jury is still out on K3/Q3.8 and if they are equivalent to Opus or Fable.
I didn't find a direct proof earlier, just assertions - I've only seen it proved in textbooks that aren't linkable.
I think this is the point that's really missing; that it isn't just the person and the environment need to match, as though the environme...
I think this is the point that's really missing; that it isn't just the person and the environment need to match, as though the environment is some immutable thing. As a manager, you have to notice when your "A" players are falling and change things if necessary. You can change the environment to make more "A" players out of your team. Though, sadly, more often management winds up making "B" players out of "A" players. Or making ex-employees out of them. By the way, there is a counter-argument. The true "A" players are go-getters who bring about organizational change, who seek out challenges in an unchallenging environment, etc. The "B" players aren't demotivated by bad management, a hostile environment, lack of freedom or respect - they're people who are just naturally unmotivated, lazy, etc. I hate that argument, of course. It suggests motivation and productivity is just some innate, immutable trait. And ultimately, it exists to excuse managerial failings.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.