IssueRaiser

> I think the opinion is split on whether prostitution is inherently harmful -- that is, in a post-gender world where there is no trance ...

> I think the opinion is split on whether prostitution is inherently harmful -- that is, in a post-gender world where there is no trance of social definition of women as stores of resources to be extracted for pleasure and service, would prostitution still be socially harmful? -- but I don't think it matters for the questions at hand. I think it does matter - in fact this seems to be exactly the pain-point in this whole thread, that everyone differs on that particular point. If it isn't inherently harmful (and again, I haven't thought about it enough to decide), then your line of argument seems to conflate feminist causes with sex workers', and we'd be trampling over a non-harmful industry just to further the cause of feminism [^]. On the other hand, if it is inherently harmful, there's no need to entangle the two either, and we should legislate against it regardless of whether it damages women as a class or not. Thanks for all the links. [^] edit: which may be a legitimate reason, of course. But it would avoid most of the discussion in this subthread.

Posted by yungchin on Mar 6, 2015, 9:48 AM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments

hackernews (EdTech)

> I think the opinion is split on whether prostitution is inherently harmful -- that is, in a post-gender world where there is no trance ...

yungchinMar 6, 2015, 9:48 AM

> I think the opinion is split on whether prostitution is inherently harmful -- that is, in a post-gender world where there is no trance of social definition of women as stores of resources to be extracted for pleasure and service, would prostitution still be socially harmful? -- but I don't think it matters for the questions at hand. I think it does matter - in fact this seems to be exactly the pain-point in this whole thread, that everyone differs on that particular point. If it isn't inherently harmful (and again, I haven't thought about it enough to decide), then your line of argument seems to conflate feminist causes with sex workers', and we'd be trampling over a non-harmful industry just to further the cause of feminism [^]. On the other hand, if it is inherently harmful, there's no need to entangle the two either, and we should legislate against it regardless of whether it damages women as a class or not. Thanks for all the links. [^] edit: which may be a legitimate reason, of course. But it would avoid most of the discussion in this subthread.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue