Of course microkernel approach is more secure, if a driver gets p0wned, corrupts data structures, or plain keeps crashing, it doesn't tak...
Of course microkernel approach is more secure, if a driver gets p0wned, corrupts data structures, or plain keeps crashing, it doesn't take the whole kernel with it. Naturally the issue might be as bad that the whole stack can't recover from, but still much better than corrupting the kernel. One of the SecDevOps guidelines when hardening servers is that every process should have its own user, yes. Kmods and akmods run in kernel memory space and aren't ABI stable.
Posted by pjmlp on May 2, 2023, 7:01 AM
Tags
Related issues
- I mean that's the problem though.
- I've always believed the opposite: get conditionals deep in your code so that the higher level control flow is regular.
- The biggest problem with AI isn't being able to do things.
- I am a 3D printing maker type nerd (I make my own tools for other creative tasks, rather than as their own outcomes) and I saw an incredi...
- Of course not, those are clearly scams.
- Claude makes more detailed plans that seem better if you just skim them, but when analyzed, has a lot of errors, usually.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (EdTech)
I mean that's the problem though.
I've always believed the opposite: get conditionals deep in your code so that the higher level control flow is regular.
The biggest problem with AI isn't being able to do things.
I am a 3D printing maker type nerd (I make my own tools for other creative tasks, rather than as their own outcomes) and I saw an incredi...
Of course not, those are clearly scams.
Claude makes more detailed plans that seem better if you just skim them, but when analyzed, has a lot of errors, usually.
Effectively everyone is building the same tools with zero quantitative benchmarks or evidence behind the why / ideas … this entire s...
> creating and operating a small company in Germany is a nightmare To be fair, I think the problem operating in Germany is its federated...
Of course microkernel approach is more secure, if a driver gets p0wned, corrupts data structures, or plain keeps crashing, it doesn't tak...
Of course microkernel approach is more secure, if a driver gets p0wned, corrupts data structures, or plain keeps crashing, it doesn't take the whole kernel with it. Naturally the issue might be as bad that the whole stack can't recover from, but still much better than corrupting the kernel. One of the SecDevOps guidelines when hardening servers is that every process should have its own user, yes. Kmods and akmods run in kernel memory space and aren't ABI stable.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.