> That's an opinion, not a fact.
> That's an opinion, not a fact. It’s not an opinion. You’re welcome to go read China’s own self-published strategic plans on this or a litany of news and policy journals discussing this. > This is way too expensive for something like that to last. How can you claim it’s too expensive if you’re claiming you don’t even buy that it’s happening?? > The rush to the bottom is already killing so many chinese automakers locally. The idea that they can sustain such an money bleed globally is plain asinine. Look at German automakers in China for a view of the future. As Chinese automakers compete and then consolidate they’ll raise prices of course but the level of competition and capacity build out will still have them underpricing other automakers due to economies of scale, cheap labor, and advanced manufacturing. They don’t need to sustain it really, globally they’re already poised to win which is why US, EU, Japan are going to have a lot of import controls, tariffs, and will utilize other tools to protect domestic industries.
Posted by ericmay on Mar 21, 2026, 3:17 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Living in a 200+ year old house, I've seen a lot of this first-hand through both planned and unplanned renovations and repairs.
- Is anything with the pebble time able to capture heart rate for historical data analysis?
- Datastar has evolved into a suite of tools [1].
- > real issue is that MSG is basically a public utility.
- Everything good is a slippery slope: every step in the right direction is bad if you overshoot.
- Status Update - May 2026
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
pricing (EdTech)
Living in a 200+ year old house, I've seen a lot of this first-hand through both planned and unplanned renovations and repairs.
Is anything with the pebble time able to capture heart rate for historical data analysis?
Datastar has evolved into a suite of tools [1].
> real issue is that MSG is basically a public utility.
Everything good is a slippery slope: every step in the right direction is bad if you overshoot.
Status Update - May 2026
I think what you wrote makes sense, and you missed one critical aspect : shared access to excessively expensive capitalized facilities an...
Long-range anti-ship missiles of old are also obsolete, they and their launch problems are also too expensive for their vulnerability.
> That's an opinion, not a fact.
> That's an opinion, not a fact. It’s not an opinion. You’re welcome to go read China’s own self-published strategic plans on this or a litany of news and policy journals discussing this. > This is way too expensive for something like that to last. How can you claim it’s too expensive if you’re claiming you don’t even buy that it’s happening?? > The rush to the bottom is already killing so many chinese automakers locally. The idea that they can sustain such an money bleed globally is plain asinine. Look at German automakers in China for a view of the future. As Chinese automakers compete and then consolidate they’ll raise prices of course but the level of competition and capacity build out will still have them underpricing other automakers due to economies of scale, cheap labor, and advanced manufacturing. They don’t need to sustain it really, globally they’re already poised to win which is why US, EU, Japan are going to have a lot of import controls, tariffs, and will utilize other tools to protect domestic industries.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.