I'm not asking this to be snark, but because I am still not seeing a major difference.
I'm not asking this to be snark, but because I am still not seeing a major difference. For example, take a math textbook. Generally they are broken into subjects (eg circles) and then that topic is broken into lessons (eg circumference or area). Each lesson provides tactics & formulas for solving problems, examples of applying them, and a problem set to practice with. In my experience this is basically what a teacher would present in the classroom, with the exception of their samples being more interactive, and teachers having the ability answer questions. Were you thinking of another type of textbook? I can see how this may be different for history or literature textbooks, but to me that just means that said textbooks are doing a poorer job of covering everything they should. I think a textbook shouldn't just cover content, it should facilitate learning the content.
Posted by joncalhoun on Mar 6, 2015, 6:26 PM
Tags
Related issues
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments
reliability (EdTech)
I frankly find the situation around UB puzzling.
I think it depends a little on how and where you work.
Self modifying has some sneaky failure modes with modern CPUs.
> Ban phones from class.
Coolify v5.x
Are you talking about a technical problem, or a conceptual problem?
This is not uncommon in the more blue-collar businesses.
> I wonder though, do people not strace programs any more?
I'm not asking this to be snark, but because I am still not seeing a major difference.
I'm not asking this to be snark, but because I am still not seeing a major difference. For example, take a math textbook. Generally they are broken into subjects (eg circles) and then that topic is broken into lessons (eg circumference or area). Each lesson provides tactics & formulas for solving problems, examples of applying them, and a problem set to practice with. In my experience this is basically what a teacher would present in the classroom, with the exception of their samples being more interactive, and teachers having the ability answer questions. Were you thinking of another type of textbook? I can see how this may be different for history or literature textbooks, but to me that just means that said textbooks are doing a poorer job of covering everything they should. I think a textbook shouldn't just cover content, it should facilitate learning the content.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.