The part about undergraduate versus graduate marks, to me at least, doesn't seem to say what the author thinks it says.
The part about undergraduate versus graduate marks, to me at least, doesn't seem to say what the author thinks it says. To me, it says "your marking scheme for graduates is broken". The entire purpose of marks is to classify the people taking the course. Or, to put it another way: When everyone is super, no-one is.
Posted by TheLoneWolfling on Apr 10, 2015, 3:36 AM
Tags
Related issues
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,000 issues0 comments
reliability (EdTech)
I frankly find the situation around UB puzzling.
I think it depends a little on how and where you work.
Self modifying has some sneaky failure modes with modern CPUs.
> Ban phones from class.
Coolify v5.x
Are you talking about a technical problem, or a conceptual problem?
This is not uncommon in the more blue-collar businesses.
> I wonder though, do people not strace programs any more?
The part about undergraduate versus graduate marks, to me at least, doesn't seem to say what the author thinks it says.
The part about undergraduate versus graduate marks, to me at least, doesn't seem to say what the author thinks it says. To me, it says "your marking scheme for graduates is broken". The entire purpose of marks is to classify the people taking the course. Or, to put it another way: When everyone is super, no-one is.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.