> There are correlations to problems in the general population.
> There are correlations to problems in the general population. For examples, homosexuality and narcotics usage. The latter of which is not a problem - for those people. More generally: longevity is a accurate indicator of all net problems for people, ranging from social problems to suicide to schizophrenia to drug abuse to disease rates. Is longevity lower for the high-IQ? No, it is not. It is higher. So much for your 'inextricably complex web'. > Longevity and physical attractiveness are correlated. I believe this is mostly driven by the low-end, is it not? All those 'funny-looking kids'. > If I could lay $500 that these efforts will completely fail with animals, I would. You can't, of course, because that would be a waste of time; there are no measures of general intelligence nearly as well-validated with any animals as for humans (whether you want to specify cognitive functioning or life outcomes), and if there were, no one would bother to capture nearly enough genomes or genotypes to nail down the respective variants.
Posted by gwern on Oct 17, 2014, 2:22 AM
Tags
Related issues
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
reliability (EdTech)
I frankly find the situation around UB puzzling.
I think it depends a little on how and where you work.
Self modifying has some sneaky failure modes with modern CPUs.
> Ban phones from class.
Coolify v5.x
Are you talking about a technical problem, or a conceptual problem?
This is not uncommon in the more blue-collar businesses.
> I wonder though, do people not strace programs any more?
> There are correlations to problems in the general population.
> There are correlations to problems in the general population. For examples, homosexuality and narcotics usage. The latter of which is not a problem - for those people. More generally: longevity is a accurate indicator of all net problems for people, ranging from social problems to suicide to schizophrenia to drug abuse to disease rates. Is longevity lower for the high-IQ? No, it is not. It is higher. So much for your 'inextricably complex web'. > Longevity and physical attractiveness are correlated. I believe this is mostly driven by the low-end, is it not? All those 'funny-looking kids'. > If I could lay $500 that these efforts will completely fail with animals, I would. You can't, of course, because that would be a waste of time; there are no measures of general intelligence nearly as well-validated with any animals as for humans (whether you want to specify cognitive functioning or life outcomes), and if there were, no one would bother to capture nearly enough genomes or genotypes to nail down the respective variants.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.