IssueRaiser

This sounds about as effective as medical ethics codes: > Listen up, this will be on the test.

This sounds about as effective as medical ethics codes: > Listen up, this will be on the test. You need to help patients, not hurt them. You need to be responsible. Try to avoid being irresponsible. Try to act professionally, and to be a positive asset to society. Don't abuse nurses. If someone asks you do to something unethical, tell them you won't. Did I mention you need to help patients, and not hurt them? > If reading that paragraph seemed like a waste of your time, imagine how I feel after attending the three hour lecture version. That's from Against medical ethics [1], an early post by psychologist Scott Alexander, who has since started writing at http://slatestarcodex.com/ People writing this sort of software either don't think they're causing harm, or they rationalize it. If the writer of malicious or deceptive software doesn't realize they're doing harm, no programming ethics course will help. The same is true if they rationalize their behavior with reasoning like, "If someone is dumb enough to get this spyware, they shouldn't be online." or "If I stopped doing this job, someone else would take my place tomorrow." I'm not sure what the best solution is, but ethics codes seem like a complete waste of time. 1. http://squid314.livejournal.com/285785.html

Posted by chroma on Feb 27, 2015, 6:14 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments

hackernews (Healthcare)

This sounds about as effective as medical ethics codes: > Listen up, this will be on the test.

chromaFeb 27, 2015, 6:14 PM

This sounds about as effective as medical ethics codes: > Listen up, this will be on the test. You need to help patients, not hurt them. You need to be responsible. Try to avoid being irresponsible. Try to act professionally, and to be a positive asset to society. Don't abuse nurses. If someone asks you do to something unethical, tell them you won't. Did I mention you need to help patients, and not hurt them? > If reading that paragraph seemed like a waste of your time, imagine how I feel after attending the three hour lecture version. That's from Against medical ethics [1], an early post by psychologist Scott Alexander, who has since started writing at http://slatestarcodex.com/ People writing this sort of software either don't think they're causing harm, or they rationalize it. If the writer of malicious or deceptive software doesn't realize they're doing harm, no programming ethics course will help. The same is true if they rationalize their behavior with reasoning like, "If someone is dumb enough to get this spyware, they shouldn't be online." or "If I stopped doing this job, someone else would take my place tomorrow." I'm not sure what the best solution is, but ethics codes seem like a complete waste of time. 1. http://squid314.livejournal.com/285785.html

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue