> Is that what we want?
> Is that what we want? Only if there are some very fundamental and convincing arguments that are still not uncovered. We can't protect science and let services like medical services be too expensive for people to have access to them. That would be introducing new social classes: people who do science can get unnecessary protection, everybody else can not. That is not going to fly.
Posted by tossandthrow on Feb 25, 2026, 7:38 AM
Tags
Related issues
- People hate it when faceless bureaucrats decide that some health care expense is too expensive for the large faceless bureaucracy to cove...
- > I will never understand why people think ACA was so great.
- Turning oneself in doesn't absolve one of a crime.
- All that we know is that the doctor carefully guided the patient out of the intervention, flashing a value that nobody had introduced bef...
- If we're gonna stick with private insurance in the US, we should detach it from employment.
- >Putting the entire population on vitamin D supplements would be too expensive for the country’s national health service, he told me.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
pricing (Healthcare)
People hate it when faceless bureaucrats decide that some health care expense is too expensive for the large faceless bureaucracy to cove...
> I will never understand why people think ACA was so great.
Turning oneself in doesn't absolve one of a crime.
All that we know is that the doctor carefully guided the patient out of the intervention, flashing a value that nobody had introduced bef...
> Is that what we want?
If we're gonna stick with private insurance in the US, we should detach it from employment.
>Putting the entire population on vitamin D supplements would be too expensive for the country’s national health service, he told me.
> At a checkup a few years ago, a doctor told me I was deficient in vitamin D.
> Is that what we want?
> Is that what we want? Only if there are some very fundamental and convincing arguments that are still not uncovered. We can't protect science and let services like medical services be too expensive for people to have access to them. That would be introducing new social classes: people who do science can get unnecessary protection, everybody else can not. That is not going to fly.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.