Every single value in Python is weakly defined, and can change at runtime.
Every single value in Python is weakly defined, and can change at runtime. Functions can accept any set of parameters, objects do not need to conform to a class, the entire namespace can be replaced during the execution of a function. If you have a better name than "flexibility", please tell me, because I can't think of any. Haskell is in the oposite extreme of that dimension. Anyway, that has no relation to readability. Python's flexibility leads too easily to metaprogramming, for example, what's extremely powerfull, but a nightmare to read. And classifying a language as "mathematical" is borderline nonsensical - it only carries some slight meaning because people that say that normaly want to say "algebrical", in oposition to, maybe, "logic-temporal".
Posted by marcosdumay on Aug 1, 2014, 10:49 PM
Tags
Related issues
- I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
- My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
- Because it works too reliably.
- OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
- This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
- These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Marketing)
I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
Because it works too reliably.
OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
> We can see that because people who put their money where their mouths are, like venture capitalists, encourage those behaviors.
So what is the unmet need behind an obsession with sexless/child-like figures?
Every single value in Python is weakly defined, and can change at runtime.
Every single value in Python is weakly defined, and can change at runtime. Functions can accept any set of parameters, objects do not need to conform to a class, the entire namespace can be replaced during the execution of a function. If you have a better name than "flexibility", please tell me, because I can't think of any. Haskell is in the oposite extreme of that dimension. Anyway, that has no relation to readability. Python's flexibility leads too easily to metaprogramming, for example, what's extremely powerfull, but a nightmare to read. And classifying a language as "mathematical" is borderline nonsensical - it only carries some slight meaning because people that say that normaly want to say "algebrical", in oposition to, maybe, "logic-temporal".
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.