It looks like Mozilla is chasing tech buzzwords, but are always a few steps too far behind to actually do any impact.
It looks like Mozilla is chasing tech buzzwords, but are always a few steps too far behind to actually do any impact. Why not focus on what they are doing best (i.e. browser, email)? There's still plenty to do, Firefox keeps crashing both on my desktop PC and Android phone, now Thunderbird is abandoned. IoT market is full of big players with vast amount of resources and saturated not less (if not more) than smartphone market, I don't see how they gonna compete there. As for OSS, Linux is doing great and keeps doing better in IoT scene[0], why not merge efforts? I appreciate Mozilla's efforts, but lately it lacks focus and clear goals. Maybe some fresh blood would help? We will explore and prototype new use cases in the world of connected devices as an open source project with a clear focus on the user benefit and experience. ..yada yada, sounds like a buzzword filled marketing crap with no substance whatsoever[1]. 0. https://www.linux.com/news/embedded-mobile/mobile-linux/8180... 1. https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/5/005/04f/263/04c1eb8.jpg
Posted by kbart on Dec 11, 2015, 11:42 AM
Tags
Related issues
- I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
- My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
- Because it works too reliably.
- OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
- This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
- These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Marketing)
I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
Because it works too reliably.
OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
> We can see that because people who put their money where their mouths are, like venture capitalists, encourage those behaviors.
So what is the unmet need behind an obsession with sexless/child-like figures?
It looks like Mozilla is chasing tech buzzwords, but are always a few steps too far behind to actually do any impact.
It looks like Mozilla is chasing tech buzzwords, but are always a few steps too far behind to actually do any impact. Why not focus on what they are doing best (i.e. browser, email)? There's still plenty to do, Firefox keeps crashing both on my desktop PC and Android phone, now Thunderbird is abandoned. IoT market is full of big players with vast amount of resources and saturated not less (if not more) than smartphone market, I don't see how they gonna compete there. As for OSS, Linux is doing great and keeps doing better in IoT scene[0], why not merge efforts? I appreciate Mozilla's efforts, but lately it lacks focus and clear goals. Maybe some fresh blood would help? We will explore and prototype new use cases in the world of connected devices as an open source project with a clear focus on the user benefit and experience. ..yada yada, sounds like a buzzword filled marketing crap with no substance whatsoever[1]. 0. https://www.linux.com/news/embedded-mobile/mobile-linux/8180... 1. https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/5/005/04f/263/04c1eb8.jpg
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.