Just a casual observation, but you don't appear to be listening to me.
Just a casual observation, but you don't appear to be listening to me. You are making rationalizations of my statements instead of trying to see my point. For example, I didn't say it was the same as marketing, I said that it's 'fine for marketing', i.e. posting in union when trying to spread interest would be a fine thing for a group account. What I may be failing to communicate here is how trust is established between entities like companies and entities like individuals. When there is a issue with trust with individuals, like in the OPs post, it's best to establish 'point-to-point' communications with people you know so you can build up the trusted relationship. Doing that as a company doesn't really work well for that. BTW, comments like "weave has lots of very happy users who find that weave is plenty fast enough for their purposes" are implicit trust statements based on bandwagon bias. What you are actually saying is there exist a group of people who don't feel the way the poster feels and are happy with the product's current state. The implication of your statement is that others should feel this way, but there's really no way to establish that unless we heard from all those people directly. This is yet another example of why consensus sucks when trying to establish the truth for an individual. (Bitcoin has figured this out, however.) I think about trust a lot for work, so take my comments with a grain of salt. Nobody died here. :)
Posted by kordless on May 7, 2015, 3:36 PM
Tags
Related issues
- I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
- My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
- Because it works too reliably.
- OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
- This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
- These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Marketing)
I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
Because it works too reliably.
OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
> We can see that because people who put their money where their mouths are, like venture capitalists, encourage those behaviors.
So what is the unmet need behind an obsession with sexless/child-like figures?
Just a casual observation, but you don't appear to be listening to me.
Just a casual observation, but you don't appear to be listening to me. You are making rationalizations of my statements instead of trying to see my point. For example, I didn't say it was the same as marketing, I said that it's 'fine for marketing', i.e. posting in union when trying to spread interest would be a fine thing for a group account. What I may be failing to communicate here is how trust is established between entities like companies and entities like individuals. When there is a issue with trust with individuals, like in the OPs post, it's best to establish 'point-to-point' communications with people you know so you can build up the trusted relationship. Doing that as a company doesn't really work well for that. BTW, comments like "weave has lots of very happy users who find that weave is plenty fast enough for their purposes" are implicit trust statements based on bandwagon bias. What you are actually saying is there exist a group of people who don't feel the way the poster feels and are happy with the product's current state. The implication of your statement is that others should feel this way, but there's really no way to establish that unless we heard from all those people directly. This is yet another example of why consensus sucks when trying to establish the truth for an individual. (Bitcoin has figured this out, however.) I think about trust a lot for work, so take my comments with a grain of salt. Nobody died here. :)
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.