The article's title is "How they played you like a fool" but in the article I feel like all I see are marketing gimmicks for the brand ov...
The article's title is "How they played you like a fool" but in the article I feel like all I see are marketing gimmicks for the brand over and over. Each item is basically a small marketing paragraph why beats did it in spite of the nerds telling them they had inferior quality and were overpriced, and then a big picture of a celebrity trying to look cool wearing beats. #1. They found the golden niche #2. They Ignored the critics and naysayers #3. They pulled on the biggest celeb names they could find #4. They looked at what consumers wanted, then made it #5. They trusted their gut and risked it all #6. They moved fast #7. They had BIG brand help #8. Don’t get cocky, never think you are done This list reads like they are writing for the what used to be the underdog (Apple) but instead selling garbage to people who dont know any better. Why should I laud this company?
Posted by hobs on Apr 2, 2015, 11:59 AM
Tags
Related issues
- I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
- My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
- Because it works too reliably.
- OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
- This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
- These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Marketing)
I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
Because it works too reliably.
OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
> We can see that because people who put their money where their mouths are, like venture capitalists, encourage those behaviors.
So what is the unmet need behind an obsession with sexless/child-like figures?
The article's title is "How they played you like a fool" but in the article I feel like all I see are marketing gimmicks for the brand ov...
The article's title is "How they played you like a fool" but in the article I feel like all I see are marketing gimmicks for the brand over and over. Each item is basically a small marketing paragraph why beats did it in spite of the nerds telling them they had inferior quality and were overpriced, and then a big picture of a celebrity trying to look cool wearing beats. #1. They found the golden niche #2. They Ignored the critics and naysayers #3. They pulled on the biggest celeb names they could find #4. They looked at what consumers wanted, then made it #5. They trusted their gut and risked it all #6. They moved fast #7. They had BIG brand help #8. Don’t get cocky, never think you are done This list reads like they are writing for the what used to be the underdog (Apple) but instead selling garbage to people who dont know any better. Why should I laud this company?
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.