With all the talk of negatively being removed from HN, why aren't we removing articles like this?
With all the talk of negatively being removed from HN, why aren't we removing articles like this? It's so completely biased and negative. It will do nothing but insight flame wars. "Everyone who denies climate change has the same stirring message," Nobody is denying that the climate is actually changing. We are skeptical that a cycle that has happened for 1000 of years is now only being effected by man made contributions. My issue is that we don't even know how much of it is actually due to cycles, how can we possibly put all of the blame on something man-made. Weather, which is the first step to climate, can't even be predicted past 2 weeks from the best scientists in the world. How are we now able to predict something that will happen in 50 or 100 years? I see the same tactics used when I'm buying a car: If we don't give the government more money, we are all going to die a horrible death because the earth will increase a few degrees. This isn't science, it's marketing. It's also suspect when many forums, which claim to be open and honest, will not allow alternative view points. I'm also tired of hearing the phrase "settled science". Science is never really settled. When it is, it's called religion.
Posted by paulhauggis on May 6, 2015, 6:08 PM
Tags
Related issues
- I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
- My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
- Because it works too reliably.
- OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
- This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
- These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Marketing)
I think this release is really going to give them a hard time selling Fable: > On our benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in agentic codin...
My biggest problem with this is that this regulation is only aimed at AI.
Because it works too reliably.
OCaml's type system is quite janky and simplistic compared to Haskell's.
This is a very annoying problem, it's infuriating, you pay 10 USD<->20 USD/mo, and the ads are not even removed.
These are markets that are being developed actively by car companies.
> We can see that because people who put their money where their mouths are, like venture capitalists, encourage those behaviors.
So what is the unmet need behind an obsession with sexless/child-like figures?
With all the talk of negatively being removed from HN, why aren't we removing articles like this?
With all the talk of negatively being removed from HN, why aren't we removing articles like this? It's so completely biased and negative. It will do nothing but insight flame wars. "Everyone who denies climate change has the same stirring message," Nobody is denying that the climate is actually changing. We are skeptical that a cycle that has happened for 1000 of years is now only being effected by man made contributions. My issue is that we don't even know how much of it is actually due to cycles, how can we possibly put all of the blame on something man-made. Weather, which is the first step to climate, can't even be predicted past 2 weeks from the best scientists in the world. How are we now able to predict something that will happen in 50 or 100 years? I see the same tactics used when I'm buying a car: If we don't give the government more money, we are all going to die a horrible death because the earth will increase a few degrees. This isn't science, it's marketing. It's also suspect when many forums, which claim to be open and honest, will not allow alternative view points. I'm also tired of hearing the phrase "settled science". Science is never really settled. When it is, it's called religion.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.