IssueRaiser

Not quite, but sort of.

Not quite, but sort of. First, I don't think the transaction costs are hidden at all. But that aside, the transaction costs are exactly where they belong: with the miners. Effectively, all the transaction costs up front and applied once. The problem with existing financial transactions is that they take a cut every time a transaction is made. In fact, they take little cuts every time a transaction passes through their system/network/etc. Start with one dollar and send it through enough "transactions" and you end up with nothing. Bitcoin effectively solves this problem. No middle-man scum sitting between a financial transaction ever "adds value" (how a I hate that term). They just leech off the capital of the people. This is why I want bitcoin to succeed. (Ended up a bit ranty there at the end. Sorry.)

Posted by commentzorro on Jul 24, 2015, 10:51 AM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments

complaint (Network)

Not quite, but sort of.

commentzorroJul 24, 2015, 10:51 AM

Not quite, but sort of. First, I don't think the transaction costs are hidden at all. But that aside, the transaction costs are exactly where they belong: with the miners. Effectively, all the transaction costs up front and applied once. The problem with existing financial transactions is that they take a cut every time a transaction is made. In fact, they take little cuts every time a transaction passes through their system/network/etc. Start with one dollar and send it through enough "transactions" and you end up with nothing. Bitcoin effectively solves this problem. No middle-man scum sitting between a financial transaction ever "adds value" (how a I hate that term). They just leech off the capital of the people. This is why I want bitcoin to succeed. (Ended up a bit ranty there at the end. Sorry.)

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue