Apologies, I did not mean to imply that the set of [dead] posts was "the news".
Apologies, I did not mean to imply that the set of [dead] posts was "the news". Rather, I understand and appreciate the moderation strategy as it applies to discussion. That said, there's a subset of intellectually stimulating news that also happens to not be great discussion material. In the hypothetical where there's some important news that warrants being seen but you know the discussion would be impossible, why is there no option to just lock the discussion? Again, this is a hypothetical where the* news is deemed intellectually stimulating, important, or otherwise deserving* to be shown. I trust you have a reasonable answer, I just didn't see it in your comment. I respect the efforts you put in and the wonderful place it carves out on* the internet. Thank you! Edit: edits
Posted by hnums on Jan 22, 2025, 12:24 AM
Tags
Related issues
- (1) Because it doesn't actually solve the problem.
- Every time fossil comes up, I hear this same issue - "why is there no rebase?" And honestly, I've never been able to get this argument.
- My biggest problem with running local LLMs on my M4 Max/128GB RAM is the prefill latency.
- Biggest problem with httpx I see is authors sanity https://github.com/encode/httpx/discussions/3784 .
- There aren't many situations today that make one think: Why doesn't this business have a website?
- > IAM can stay MS That's leaving the most critical component still with a US company.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.4,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Network)
(1) Because it doesn't actually solve the problem.
Every time fossil comes up, I hear this same issue - "why is there no rebase?" And honestly, I've never been able to get this argument.
My biggest problem with running local LLMs on my M4 Max/128GB RAM is the prefill latency.
Biggest problem with httpx I see is authors sanity https://github.com/encode/httpx/discussions/3784 .
There aren't many situations today that make one think: Why doesn't this business have a website?
> IAM can stay MS That's leaving the most critical component still with a US company.
I am very petty about this one bug and have a very old axe to grind that this reminded me of!
Not just the edge router.
Apologies, I did not mean to imply that the set of [dead] posts was "the news".
Apologies, I did not mean to imply that the set of [dead] posts was "the news". Rather, I understand and appreciate the moderation strategy as it applies to discussion. That said, there's a subset of intellectually stimulating news that also happens to not be great discussion material. In the hypothetical where there's some important news that warrants being seen but you know the discussion would be impossible, why is there no option to just lock the discussion? Again, this is a hypothetical where the* news is deemed intellectually stimulating, important, or otherwise deserving* to be shown. I trust you have a reasonable answer, I just didn't see it in your comment. I respect the efforts you put in and the wonderful place it carves out on* the internet. Thank you! Edit: edits
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.