> Roy Thomas Fielding (born 1965) is an American computer scientist,[1] one of the principal authors of the HTTP specification, an author...
> Roy Thomas Fielding (born 1965) is an American computer scientist,[1] one of the principal authors of the HTTP specification, an authority on computer network architecture[2] and co-founder of the Apache HTTP Server project. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Fielding A good read, and he's not just blowing smoke. > If the IETF wants to improve privacy, it should work on protocols that provide anonymous access to signed artifacts (authentication of the content, not the connection) that is independent of the user's access mechanism. But it seems to me that there is basically no way to request access to any kind of data, without it being traceable in some manner; at the very least the ISP would still see the traffic. I guess you could argue for TOR, but that still allows vectors and has its own issues to worry about. Funny, we need the same kinda access that radio and TV used to provide; where you could just "tune in" to something and have a listen, and you were more or less untraceable; even if you were to broadcast on that frequency your traceability, while triangulable, is still fairly anonymous. But on the internet, there is no such way to broadcast like that. Maybe that's a design flaw, maybe it's a feature.
Posted by meesterdude on Jun 5, 2015, 6:48 AM
Tags
Related issues
- (1) Because it doesn't actually solve the problem.
- Every time fossil comes up, I hear this same issue - "why is there no rebase?" And honestly, I've never been able to get this argument.
- My biggest problem with running local LLMs on my M4 Max/128GB RAM is the prefill latency.
- Biggest problem with httpx I see is authors sanity https://github.com/encode/httpx/discussions/3784 .
- There aren't many situations today that make one think: Why doesn't this business have a website?
- > IAM can stay MS That's leaving the most critical component still with a US company.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Network)
(1) Because it doesn't actually solve the problem.
Every time fossil comes up, I hear this same issue - "why is there no rebase?" And honestly, I've never been able to get this argument.
My biggest problem with running local LLMs on my M4 Max/128GB RAM is the prefill latency.
Biggest problem with httpx I see is authors sanity https://github.com/encode/httpx/discussions/3784 .
There aren't many situations today that make one think: Why doesn't this business have a website?
> IAM can stay MS That's leaving the most critical component still with a US company.
I am very petty about this one bug and have a very old axe to grind that this reminded me of!
Not just the edge router.
> Roy Thomas Fielding (born 1965) is an American computer scientist,[1] one of the principal authors of the HTTP specification, an author...
> Roy Thomas Fielding (born 1965) is an American computer scientist,[1] one of the principal authors of the HTTP specification, an authority on computer network architecture[2] and co-founder of the Apache HTTP Server project. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Fielding A good read, and he's not just blowing smoke. > If the IETF wants to improve privacy, it should work on protocols that provide anonymous access to signed artifacts (authentication of the content, not the connection) that is independent of the user's access mechanism. But it seems to me that there is basically no way to request access to any kind of data, without it being traceable in some manner; at the very least the ISP would still see the traffic. I guess you could argue for TOR, but that still allows vectors and has its own issues to worry about. Funny, we need the same kinda access that radio and TV used to provide; where you could just "tune in" to something and have a listen, and you were more or less untraceable; even if you were to broadcast on that frequency your traceability, while triangulable, is still fairly anonymous. But on the internet, there is no such way to broadcast like that. Maybe that's a design flaw, maybe it's a feature.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.