This is a specious article.
This is a specious article. The internet landscape is not like 3D space. One can agree to keep Antarctica demilitarized because it would be too expensive for a private person to 'militarize' it. The internet, anyone can 'militarize' it. So you have to have both offensive and defensive capabilities because the barrier to entry for militarization by any third party is trivial. In addition, it would seem they are conflating a freedom of the public internet with keeping the internet medium free of maleficence. The latter is night impossible. The internet is a medium not an object. The thing about Iran is that it was the best option. You don't refuse to use a tool like that over principle and instead choose a hardware or 'hot' war instead. It would be like refusing to use spies because spies are 'unseemly'. And to be strict, it was not done over the internet but via USB sticks. It's an article to get people thinking but in reality it's self-satisfaction. I'm sure I could try to be cleaver and write something called 'the hypocrisy of amateur internet journalists'
Posted by mc32 on Jan 18, 2015, 3:55 AM
Tags
Related issues
- My biggest problem with batteries for grid outages is that the only outages I am actually concerned with would drain them to zero before ...
- there are tons of TLDs that are cheap I'm not even sure what you are offering after reading this, but cloud is an even harder sell becau...
- > One can't expect that every driver package submission from every vendor is thoroughly vetted every time, this is a matter of trust and ...
- Too expensive for a worse vehicle than the Model Y (with incentives, it was a >$20K difference).
- Starlink only has 10 Million customers, too expensive for most countries already.
- The U7 Lite only does 2x2 MIMO.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.8,000 issues0 comments
pricing (Network)
My biggest problem with batteries for grid outages is that the only outages I am actually concerned with would drain them to zero before ...
Newthere are tons of TLDs that are cheap I'm not even sure what you are offering after reading this, but cloud is an even harder sell becau...
> One can't expect that every driver package submission from every vendor is thoroughly vetted every time, this is a matter of trust and ...
Too expensive for a worse vehicle than the Model Y (with incentives, it was a >$20K difference).
Starlink only has 10 Million customers, too expensive for most countries already.
The U7 Lite only does 2x2 MIMO.
Iranians use VPNs simply because they want to access the internet.
> When you don't want the ads and privacy invasion, you don't visit the website.
This is a specious article.
This is a specious article. The internet landscape is not like 3D space. One can agree to keep Antarctica demilitarized because it would be too expensive for a private person to 'militarize' it. The internet, anyone can 'militarize' it. So you have to have both offensive and defensive capabilities because the barrier to entry for militarization by any third party is trivial. In addition, it would seem they are conflating a freedom of the public internet with keeping the internet medium free of maleficence. The latter is night impossible. The internet is a medium not an object. The thing about Iran is that it was the best option. You don't refuse to use a tool like that over principle and instead choose a hardware or 'hot' war instead. It would be like refusing to use spies because spies are 'unseemly'. And to be strict, it was not done over the internet but via USB sticks. It's an article to get people thinking but in reality it's self-satisfaction. I'm sure I could try to be cleaver and write something called 'the hypocrisy of amateur internet journalists'
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.