Add WebTransport support
### What is the problem this feature would solve? The current version of Bun does not support HTTP/3, which limits its ability to leverage modern web protocols such as WebTransport. This can be a significant limitation for developers who require low-latency, reliable, and efficient transport protocols for real-time communication and other advanced web applications. ### What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem? I propose that Bun adds support for HTTP/3, including full support for WebTransport. This would enable developers to utilize the latest web technologies for better performance and reliability, particularly in scenarios involving real-time communication, streaming, and other low-latency applications. ### What alternatives have you considered? Alternatives considered include using a reverse proxy like NGINX or Caddy that supports HTTP/3 to handle requests before passing them to Bun. However, this adds complexity to the deployment setup and doesn't offer the native HTTP/3 benefits directly in Bun. Another alternative is using other runtimes that natively support HTTP/3, but this would mean moving away from Bun's ecosystem, which is not ideal.
Posted by libersoft-org on Aug 31, 2024, 10:27 PM
Tags
Related issues
- That Reddit post is feeding more conspiracy thinking than helping.
- Support BYOK/Custom Models for Inline Code Completions
- DNS-PERSIST-01 challenge support (planned for late Q1 2026)
- Yeah I can't really blame people for not realising they have shitty mics and shitty internet because it's really hard for them to tell!
- Onboarding guide for FluentAssertions
- > solar electricity is already cheaper than natural gas Does that include transmission?
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
support (Network)
That Reddit post is feeding more conspiracy thinking than helping.
Support BYOK/Custom Models for Inline Code Completions
DNS-PERSIST-01 challenge support (planned for late Q1 2026)
Yeah I can't really blame people for not realising they have shitty mics and shitty internet because it's really hard for them to tell!
Onboarding guide for FluentAssertions
Add WebTransport support
> solar electricity is already cheaper than natural gas Does that include transmission?
Support for WireGuard only peers
Add WebTransport support
### What is the problem this feature would solve? The current version of Bun does not support HTTP/3, which limits its ability to leverage modern web protocols such as WebTransport. This can be a significant limitation for developers who require low-latency, reliable, and efficient transport protocols for real-time communication and other advanced web applications. ### What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem? I propose that Bun adds support for HTTP/3, including full support for WebTransport. This would enable developers to utilize the latest web technologies for better performance and reliability, particularly in scenarios involving real-time communication, streaming, and other low-latency applications. ### What alternatives have you considered? Alternatives considered include using a reverse proxy like NGINX or Caddy that supports HTTP/3 to handle requests before passing them to Bun. However, this adds complexity to the deployment setup and doesn't offer the native HTTP/3 benefits directly in Bun. Another alternative is using other runtimes that natively support HTTP/3, but this would mean moving away from Bun's ecosystem, which is not ideal.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.