As a hobbyist adult mango artist, I have to agree, the internet has done wonders for sex.
As a hobbyist adult mango artist, I have to agree, the internet has done wonders for sex. And, as a ME/CS engineer, I would really like to be able to be at the forefront of further advances in the field of robotics... But all hype and optimism aside, why is there no medication for female sexual dysfunction? I'm trying to come up reason by looking at this from various perspectives, but nothing seems to make much sense. From a religious point of view, reproduction in a marriage is important, so it'd make sense if the female is sexually interested. From an economic point of view, developing a drug that solves a market need is worth tons of money (also no competition). From a feminist point of view, a woman's body, including her sex, should be her own and any dysfunctions she should be entitled to fix. From a misogynist's point of view, sex is one of the things a woman is good for, so it makes sense you can have it with her. So why is there no drug for female sexual dysfunction? Is it really difficult technically or something?
Posted by ffn on Apr 27, 2015, 10:32 PM
Tags
Related issues
- I've been thinking about this question a lot recently and have asked my friends for their opinions.
- > There's really no reason console games of that era needed, or even could benefit from 6 cores First: One problem of the PS3 was that i...
- Remote session/task persistence: Detach, preserve, and reattach all active tasks, terminals, and extension processes in VS Code Remote
- Not only Eddie, their account control panels and site in general look like something from the 90s, and it seriously hampers their business.
- Signal don't want you to build 3rd party clients and integrations, they are another fully centralised product meant to capture and lock u...
- The page keeps crashing for me.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,000 issues0 comments
ux (Network)
I've been thinking about this question a lot recently and have asked my friends for their opinions.
> There's really no reason console games of that era needed, or even could benefit from 6 cores First: One problem of the PS3 was that i...
Remote session/task persistence: Detach, preserve, and reattach all active tasks, terminals, and extension processes in VS Code Remote
Not only Eddie, their account control panels and site in general look like something from the 90s, and it seriously hampers their business.
Signal don't want you to build 3rd party clients and integrations, they are another fully centralised product meant to capture and lock u...
The page keeps crashing for me.
Server-side pagination to make ArgoCD UI a rocket
[RFC] Zero-runtime CSS-in-JS implementation
As a hobbyist adult mango artist, I have to agree, the internet has done wonders for sex.
As a hobbyist adult mango artist, I have to agree, the internet has done wonders for sex. And, as a ME/CS engineer, I would really like to be able to be at the forefront of further advances in the field of robotics... But all hype and optimism aside, why is there no medication for female sexual dysfunction? I'm trying to come up reason by looking at this from various perspectives, but nothing seems to make much sense. From a religious point of view, reproduction in a marriage is important, so it'd make sense if the female is sexually interested. From an economic point of view, developing a drug that solves a market need is worth tons of money (also no competition). From a feminist point of view, a woman's body, including her sex, should be her own and any dysfunctions she should be entitled to fix. From a misogynist's point of view, sex is one of the things a woman is good for, so it makes sense you can have it with her. So why is there no drug for female sexual dysfunction? Is it really difficult technically or something?
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.