I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedi...
I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_evidence ) study specifically related to anti-aging. I wish there was some nuanced line for science journalists to not hyperbolize about nothingburger studies in dire need of replication while also making the science exciting, slow of a process as it is. Maybe every article includes a history of the that very specific and narrow sub-branch of the field? That would be really interesting to read, and to have a gauge on how far we've come.
Posted by paimapi on Nov 2, 2026, 8:02 PM
Tags
Related issues
- That usually works well enough for risc code.
- > The Bulletin calls her Miss Swindell.
- I wish there was a way to sort by recency, if i'm mainly interested in finding obscure gems from like last 6 to 12 months of ai and tech ...
- Android work profiles allow you to run multiple isolated copies in parallel - with separate address book and all.
- The other day I saw the last episodes of The Office again.
- > someone has made the wrong editor choice Just the other day I made this comment on the topic of "nvim vs emacs", I think it fits here ...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments
complaint (Other)
I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedi...
NewThat usually works well enough for risc code.
New> The Bulletin calls her Miss Swindell.
NewI wish there was a way to sort by recency, if i'm mainly interested in finding obscure gems from like last 6 to 12 months of ai and tech ...
NewAndroid work profiles allow you to run multiple isolated copies in parallel - with separate address book and all.
NewThe other day I saw the last episodes of The Office again.
> someone has made the wrong editor choice Just the other day I made this comment on the topic of "nvim vs emacs", I think it fits here ...
GLES isn't a bad way to teach graphics but I wish there was a middle ground between it and VK.
I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedi...
I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_evidence ) study specifically related to anti-aging. I wish there was some nuanced line for science journalists to not hyperbolize about nothingburger studies in dire need of replication while also making the science exciting, slow of a process as it is. Maybe every article includes a history of the that very specific and narrow sub-branch of the field? That would be really interesting to read, and to have a gauge on how far we've come.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.