I strive for rigor in facts.
I strive for rigor in facts. Look, the fact is that the plane is kind of stubby looking and is not the quantum leap in maneuverability that, say, generation 4 represented from the previous gen. But I get very, very tired of people taking a poorly researched article that takes major sections of a report out of context (yes, I'm aware that Axe published the whole thing, but he still doesn't draw the correct conclusions from it) and then using that to say, "See? The F-35 sucks after all". The F-35 is a complex answer to a complex question, and it cannot be so simply understood. I wish it could. I love engineering simplicity and elegance and strive for it in my own designs, but anything in the military-industrial complex is hairy and ugly. And yes, I know that from personal experience. Is that a bad thing?
Posted by engi_nerd on Aug 1, 2015, 3:18 AM
Tags
Related issues
- GLES isn't a bad way to teach graphics but I wish there was a middle ground between it and VK.
- > [Edit: note that the above video is "content" so if you're not used to the style it might be offputting but I'm into it] I hate that i...
- And thats why its a large language model not a large skin cancer recognition model or large creative thinking model I hate that people th...
- I hate that this article is talking about Photocraft killing Photoshop because of AI as though Ivan Kutskir didn't build Photopea years a...
- That's a fair complaint, but for the most part that only applies to the faces (which would be an absolute nightmare to hand animate in sy...
- I wish there was something that could be done beyond feeling powerless.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments
complaint (Other)
GLES isn't a bad way to teach graphics but I wish there was a middle ground between it and VK.
New> [Edit: note that the above video is "content" so if you're not used to the style it might be offputting but I'm into it] I hate that i...
NewAnd thats why its a large language model not a large skin cancer recognition model or large creative thinking model I hate that people th...
NewI hate that this article is talking about Photocraft killing Photoshop because of AI as though Ivan Kutskir didn't build Photopea years a...
That's a fair complaint, but for the most part that only applies to the faces (which would be an absolute nightmare to hand animate in sy...
I wish there was something that could be done beyond feeling powerless.
I don’t hate taxes per se but I hate that the government will take tax dollars earmarked for one purpose, which is how they got the tax a...
I've never thought SF Symbols were beautiful.
I strive for rigor in facts.
I strive for rigor in facts. Look, the fact is that the plane is kind of stubby looking and is not the quantum leap in maneuverability that, say, generation 4 represented from the previous gen. But I get very, very tired of people taking a poorly researched article that takes major sections of a report out of context (yes, I'm aware that Axe published the whole thing, but he still doesn't draw the correct conclusions from it) and then using that to say, "See? The F-35 sucks after all". The F-35 is a complex answer to a complex question, and it cannot be so simply understood. I wish it could. I love engineering simplicity and elegance and strive for it in my own designs, but anything in the military-industrial complex is hairy and ugly. And yes, I know that from personal experience. Is that a bad thing?
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.