I was pretty enthusiastic about Adapteva's kickstarter for their Parallella board, even though I felt like some of the wording they had w...
I was pretty enthusiastic about Adapteva's kickstarter for their Parallella board, even though I felt like some of the wording they had was a bit deceptive. I began to sign on for the 64 core version but I backed out because I got burned by another Kickstarter project around the same time it began to become clear they weren't really going to make it to the funding level they needed for the 64 core version. I forget how long that's been but I have to admit to be being really disappointed that there hasn't been much demonstrable progress. There's still no 64-core version of the Parallella board. There was some talk about an update to 16-core Parallella board but I don't think it's shipped. As far as I know there's still no way to connect multiple Parallella boards using their "e-Link" ports. And lastly no way to assemble a small Adapteva cluster with a more favorable ratio between the Adapteva and Zynq (as far as power, heat and money go) than a stack of the 16-core Parallella boards. Obviously I expected too much and I guess I'm being a tad unfair. That I've seen the dev team have always been decent, reasonable, and polite; so I really hate to write anything negative at all. I just thought they'd be much further along by now and that I might have a mini many-core cluster.
Posted by Quequau on May 26, 2015, 6:50 AM
Tags
Related issues
- I wish there was a way to sort by recency, if i'm mainly interested in finding obscure gems from like last 6 to 12 months of ai and tech ...
- Android work profiles allow you to run multiple isolated copies in parallel - with separate address book and all.
- The other day I saw the last episodes of The Office again.
- > someone has made the wrong editor choice Just the other day I made this comment on the topic of "nvim vs emacs", I think it fits here ...
- GLES isn't a bad way to teach graphics but I wish there was a middle ground between it and VK.
- > [Edit: note that the above video is "content" so if you're not used to the style it might be offputting but I'm into it] I hate that i...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,500 issues0 comments
complaint (Other)
I wish there was a way to sort by recency, if i'm mainly interested in finding obscure gems from like last 6 to 12 months of ai and tech ...
NewAndroid work profiles allow you to run multiple isolated copies in parallel - with separate address book and all.
NewThe other day I saw the last episodes of The Office again.
New> someone has made the wrong editor choice Just the other day I made this comment on the topic of "nvim vs emacs", I think it fits here ...
NewGLES isn't a bad way to teach graphics but I wish there was a middle ground between it and VK.
> [Edit: note that the above video is "content" so if you're not used to the style it might be offputting but I'm into it] I hate that i...
And thats why its a large language model not a large skin cancer recognition model or large creative thinking model I hate that people th...
I hate that this article is talking about Photocraft killing Photoshop because of AI as though Ivan Kutskir didn't build Photopea years a...
I was pretty enthusiastic about Adapteva's kickstarter for their Parallella board, even though I felt like some of the wording they had w...
I was pretty enthusiastic about Adapteva's kickstarter for their Parallella board, even though I felt like some of the wording they had was a bit deceptive. I began to sign on for the 64 core version but I backed out because I got burned by another Kickstarter project around the same time it began to become clear they weren't really going to make it to the funding level they needed for the 64 core version. I forget how long that's been but I have to admit to be being really disappointed that there hasn't been much demonstrable progress. There's still no 64-core version of the Parallella board. There was some talk about an update to 16-core Parallella board but I don't think it's shipped. As far as I know there's still no way to connect multiple Parallella boards using their "e-Link" ports. And lastly no way to assemble a small Adapteva cluster with a more favorable ratio between the Adapteva and Zynq (as far as power, heat and money go) than a stack of the 16-core Parallella boards. Obviously I expected too much and I guess I'm being a tad unfair. That I've seen the dev team have always been decent, reasonable, and polite; so I really hate to write anything negative at all. I just thought they'd be much further along by now and that I might have a mini many-core cluster.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.