“Always Open in This Container” for entire domains/to include subdomains?
Hi there, I’m new to containers and enjoying the feature, especially with this “Always Open in This Container” feature. However, I was wondering if it would be feasible to add website in this category by TLD, e.g. *mozilla.org instead of www.mozilla.org, bugzilla.mozilla.org, wiki.mozilla.org… They are TLD for which I would want that (archlinux.org is another example), and some for which I don’t (likely google.com). Thanks!
Posted by ArchangeGabriel on Apr 29, 2017, 1:04 PM
Tags
Related issues
- struct's lifetime requirements can be bypassed via covariant field assignment
- Proposal to Reorganize the Moderation Team and Review Moderation Policies
- Progressive FPS degradation appears to be related to dota2.com — blocking the domain prevents the performance loss
- proposal: container/...: generic collection types
- Better Custom Endpoint BYOK
- A concrete policy for backward compatibility until Godot 5.0
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.4,500 issues0 comments
github (Other)
struct's lifetime requirements can be bypassed via covariant field assignment
Proposal to Reorganize the Moderation Team and Review Moderation Policies
Progressive FPS degradation appears to be related to dota2.com — blocking the domain prevents the performance loss
proposal: container/...: generic collection types
Better Custom Endpoint BYOK
A concrete policy for backward compatibility until Godot 5.0
New MTP models not supported
Tracking: 429 / Capacity Issues
“Always Open in This Container” for entire domains/to include subdomains?
Hi there, I’m new to containers and enjoying the feature, especially with this “Always Open in This Container” feature. However, I was wondering if it would be feasible to add website in this category by TLD, e.g. *mozilla.org instead of www.mozilla.org, bugzilla.mozilla.org, wiki.mozilla.org… They are TLD for which I would want that (archlinux.org is another example), and some for which I don’t (likely google.com). Thanks!
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.