AWS::SSM::Parameter - Type-SecureString
## 1. Title - AWS::SSM::Parameter-Type-SecureString ## 2. Scope of request When creating a new SSM Parameter resource you can create using the String and StringList Type however not SecureString. This is currently possible with additional lambda functions within the template however it will make for easier to follow templates for both parameter creation and dynamic linking to ssm parameters. We use SSM Parameters for variables, including sensitive data, so the ability to continue utilising these without manual creation before a stack deployment is desired. Sample: #### AWS::SSM::Parameter-Type-SecureString supports String and StringList but not SecureString. ## 3. Expected behaviour As part of the Console or API, we can create a new SecureString Parameter. It's expected that CloudFormation should also include this functionality. ## 4. Suggest specific test cases Common use case: Creating a securestring parameter during stack creation from inputted parameters. These parameters can then be dynamically referenced throughout the stack. Test case recommendation: Ability to create a securestring value and reference it from the same stack. ## 5. Helpful Links to speed up research and evaluation Reference Doc detailing the feature doesn't yet exist. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-ssm-parameter.html ## 6. Category Management - Systems Manager ## 7. Any additional context (optional) We currently get around this using 3 ways
Posted by benlucas11 on Aug 1, 2019, 11:25 PM
Tags
Related issues
- struct's lifetime requirements can be bypassed via covariant field assignment
- Proposal to Reorganize the Moderation Team and Review Moderation Policies
- Progressive FPS degradation appears to be related to dota2.com — blocking the domain prevents the performance loss
- proposal: container/...: generic collection types
- Better Custom Endpoint BYOK
- A concrete policy for backward compatibility until Godot 5.0
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.3,500 issues0 comments
github (Other)
struct's lifetime requirements can be bypassed via covariant field assignment
Proposal to Reorganize the Moderation Team and Review Moderation Policies
Progressive FPS degradation appears to be related to dota2.com — blocking the domain prevents the performance loss
proposal: container/...: generic collection types
Better Custom Endpoint BYOK
A concrete policy for backward compatibility until Godot 5.0
New MTP models not supported
Tracking: 429 / Capacity Issues
AWS::SSM::Parameter - Type-SecureString
## 1. Title - AWS::SSM::Parameter-Type-SecureString ## 2. Scope of request When creating a new SSM Parameter resource you can create using the String and StringList Type however not SecureString. This is currently possible with additional lambda functions within the template however it will make for easier to follow templates for both parameter creation and dynamic linking to ssm parameters. We use SSM Parameters for variables, including sensitive data, so the ability to continue utilising these without manual creation before a stack deployment is desired. Sample: #### AWS::SSM::Parameter-Type-SecureString supports String and StringList but not SecureString. ## 3. Expected behaviour As part of the Console or API, we can create a new SecureString Parameter. It's expected that CloudFormation should also include this functionality. ## 4. Suggest specific test cases Common use case: Creating a securestring parameter during stack creation from inputted parameters. These parameters can then be dynamically referenced throughout the stack. Test case recommendation: Ability to create a securestring value and reference it from the same stack. ## 5. Helpful Links to speed up research and evaluation Reference Doc detailing the feature doesn't yet exist. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-ssm-parameter.html ## 6. Category Management - Systems Manager ## 7. Any additional context (optional) We currently get around this using 3 ways
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.