Partial hydration
Unsure if this should go here or in an RFC. I'll start here, but write a proper RFC if the scope is too big for a regular issue. With the somewhat recent feature of disabling JS completely on pages it would be nice to selectively add sprinkles of JS around the page for some progressive enhancement. **Describe the solution you'd like** Svelte's action directive could work very well for this as. I briefly mentioned the idea to @pngwn and he mentioned that the life cycle hooks/methods wouldn't be usable (as we don't know when something is updated or destroyed. I think for a first version this would be fine - we would simply ignore the update and destroy functions. I don't this would be a big loss since you would lose the context of the page if you navigate away from it anyway, I think (or can you disabled JS but have the router still be enabled?). **Describe alternatives you've considered** An alternative way of doing this would be how Elder.js does it - a preprocessor that looks through your pages and finds any that are marked with some prop (`sveltekit:partial`?) and bundles that separately, injects that in some intersectionObserver solution. This would allow the usage of full components. **How important is this feature to you?** I can live without it, but partial hydration is 👌 and would give us a nice and easy way to enhance our static pages with whimsy and excitement! 👏
Posted by kevmodrome on May 9, 2021, 4:55 PM
Tags
Related issues
- struct's lifetime requirements can be bypassed via covariant field assignment
- Proposal to Reorganize the Moderation Team and Review Moderation Policies
- Progressive FPS degradation appears to be related to dota2.com — blocking the domain prevents the performance loss
- proposal: container/...: generic collection types
- Better Custom Endpoint BYOK
- A concrete policy for backward compatibility until Godot 5.0
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.3,000 issues0 comments
github (Other)
struct's lifetime requirements can be bypassed via covariant field assignment
Proposal to Reorganize the Moderation Team and Review Moderation Policies
Progressive FPS degradation appears to be related to dota2.com — blocking the domain prevents the performance loss
proposal: container/...: generic collection types
Better Custom Endpoint BYOK
A concrete policy for backward compatibility until Godot 5.0
New MTP models not supported
Tracking: 429 / Capacity Issues
Partial hydration
Unsure if this should go here or in an RFC. I'll start here, but write a proper RFC if the scope is too big for a regular issue. With the somewhat recent feature of disabling JS completely on pages it would be nice to selectively add sprinkles of JS around the page for some progressive enhancement. **Describe the solution you'd like** Svelte's action directive could work very well for this as. I briefly mentioned the idea to @pngwn and he mentioned that the life cycle hooks/methods wouldn't be usable (as we don't know when something is updated or destroyed. I think for a first version this would be fine - we would simply ignore the update and destroy functions. I don't this would be a big loss since you would lose the context of the page if you navigate away from it anyway, I think (or can you disabled JS but have the router still be enabled?). **Describe alternatives you've considered** An alternative way of doing this would be how Elder.js does it - a preprocessor that looks through your pages and finds any that are marked with some prop (`sveltekit:partial`?) and bundles that separately, injects that in some intersectionObserver solution. This would allow the usage of full components. **How important is this feature to you?** I can live without it, but partial hydration is 👌 and would give us a nice and easy way to enhance our static pages with whimsy and excitement! 👏
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.