Apparently this was posted a year ago, which is kind of frustrating for me because it's exactly the sort of analysis I've been hoping for...
Apparently this was posted a year ago, which is kind of frustrating for me because it's exactly the sort of analysis I've been hoping for since I was first introduced to TDD. I'm not really comfortable with the space that he's constructing, but at the very least it's a space. Like if you had a bunch of requirements you might be able to actually determine if TDD makes sense via somewhat objective criteria instead of via whomever makes the best appeal to pathos. What I actually want (and have been working on creating) is some sort of problem space[1] that allows you to analyze any given problem such that you can determine whether TDD will benefit or harm the development and verification of a solution. [1] - It looks suspiciously like a general purpose problem space is kind of a ridiculous thing to try and define mathematically. I've had to set my sights a bit lower than my initial goal, but the ultimate dream would be objective analysis based off of high level discussion of what the stake holders want.
Posted by Verdex on Aug 1, 2015, 2:46 PM
Tags
Related issues
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
- > steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
- Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
NewThe biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
> our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Why is there no contact form?
Apparently this was posted a year ago, which is kind of frustrating for me because it's exactly the sort of analysis I've been hoping for...
Apparently this was posted a year ago, which is kind of frustrating for me because it's exactly the sort of analysis I've been hoping for since I was first introduced to TDD. I'm not really comfortable with the space that he's constructing, but at the very least it's a space. Like if you had a bunch of requirements you might be able to actually determine if TDD makes sense via somewhat objective criteria instead of via whomever makes the best appeal to pathos. What I actually want (and have been working on creating) is some sort of problem space[1] that allows you to analyze any given problem such that you can determine whether TDD will benefit or harm the development and verification of a solution. [1] - It looks suspiciously like a general purpose problem space is kind of a ridiculous thing to try and define mathematically. I've had to set my sights a bit lower than my initial goal, but the ultimate dream would be objective analysis based off of high level discussion of what the stake holders want.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.