> but is that really any more helpful than just reading the code and seeing that join is called on each subprocess and connecting the dot...
> but is that really any more helpful than just reading the code and seeing that join is called on each subprocess and connecting the dots from there? It isn't if you have been programming using threads before ,"join" is obvious then But if you haven't and maybe you are a physicist trying to get something done in python, "p.join()" could mean anything -- "Join to what?", "Why is there no argument to join()?" "We are joining the data togther there like a list..." "It looks like we should be stopping the processes but the method is not called 'stop()' so that's not it"... That is the problem of teaching this stuff by someone who has been programming for a while, this kind of stuff gets internalized and becomes obvious but it is not obvious to a beginner.
Posted by rdtsc on Jul 13, 2014, 4:40 AM
Tags
Related issues
- Not sure what you suggest to do.
- Why is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
Not sure what you suggest to do.
NewWhy is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
NewThe biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
> but is that really any more helpful than just reading the code and seeing that join is called on each subprocess and connecting the dot...
> but is that really any more helpful than just reading the code and seeing that join is called on each subprocess and connecting the dots from there? It isn't if you have been programming using threads before ,"join" is obvious then But if you haven't and maybe you are a physicist trying to get something done in python, "p.join()" could mean anything -- "Join to what?", "Why is there no argument to join()?" "We are joining the data togther there like a list..." "It looks like we should be stopping the processes but the method is not called 'stop()' so that's not it"... That is the problem of teaching this stuff by someone who has been programming for a while, this kind of stuff gets internalized and becomes obvious but it is not obvious to a beginner.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.