>>By the end of the book, the reader is at a loss.
>>By the end of the book, the reader is at a loss. >> sounds appealing but is frustratingly vague. AHHHHHH! In a act that can only be described as `post-modern` the reviewer commits the same sin of `frustrating vague`ness that the ruined the original book. Indeed, I feel the need to write a similar review of the review to keep the meme alive. In my dreams I see a future where nobody knows of the book but for its frustrating vagueness.
Posted by frozenport on Jul 29, 2015, 7:30 AM
Tags
Related issues
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
- > steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
- Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
NewThe biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
> our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Why is there no contact form?
>>By the end of the book, the reader is at a loss.
>>By the end of the book, the reader is at a loss. >> sounds appealing but is frustratingly vague. AHHHHHH! In a act that can only be described as `post-modern` the reviewer commits the same sin of `frustrating vague`ness that the ruined the original book. Indeed, I feel the need to write a similar review of the review to keep the meme alive. In my dreams I see a future where nobody knows of the book but for its frustrating vagueness.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.