Google Maps' high-resolution "satellite" imagery is actually captured from planes.
Google Maps' high-resolution "satellite" imagery is actually captured from planes. Antarctica is huge (1.5x the area of the US), it would be a dangerous logistical nightmare to fly the sorts of patterns you need to capture aerial imagery there, and it's almost entirely covered in non-descript ice -- what would be the value of having high-resolution imagery there?
Posted by jonas21 on Feb 26, 2026, 7:02 PM
Tags
Related issues
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
- > steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
- Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
- > our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
> our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Why is there no contact form?
The biggest problem with plugging a generator into an outlet is you need a double ended cord.
Google Maps' high-resolution "satellite" imagery is actually captured from planes.
Google Maps' high-resolution "satellite" imagery is actually captured from planes. Antarctica is huge (1.5x the area of the US), it would be a dangerous logistical nightmare to fly the sorts of patterns you need to capture aerial imagery there, and it's almost entirely covered in non-descript ice -- what would be the value of having high-resolution imagery there?
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.