I don't really buy into this.
I don't really buy into this. Largely, email is a product that works pretty well out of the box. Filling in 2 forms can pull in gmail to a Mac or iOS device. Spam filters knock out spam pretty easily, which would likely need to be configured by the user anyway. Haven't really had a serious pain point with e-mail. I like technology so I would be willing to try this out, but to really get high adoption they would have to provide like a 10x improvement over traditional email, and clients. I frankly don't think this is possible. Also, email is largely free, so if you are not offering a crypto product, I can't see a business case for this. People already have completely simple and free email.
Posted by vonklaus on Aug 20, 2014, 10:19 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Not sure what you suggest to do.
- Why is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
Not sure what you suggest to do.
NewWhy is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
NewThe biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
I don't really buy into this.
I don't really buy into this. Largely, email is a product that works pretty well out of the box. Filling in 2 forms can pull in gmail to a Mac or iOS device. Spam filters knock out spam pretty easily, which would likely need to be configured by the user anyway. Haven't really had a serious pain point with e-mail. I like technology so I would be willing to try this out, but to really get high adoption they would have to provide like a 10x improvement over traditional email, and clients. I frankly don't think this is possible. Also, email is largely free, so if you are not offering a crypto product, I can't see a business case for this. People already have completely simple and free email.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.