I think you've got a point there that can be reinforced by looking at the ratio of Haskellers vs.
I think you've got a point there that can be reinforced by looking at the ratio of Haskellers vs. those comfortable with splitting things out to (.) or (>=>) Critically, however, one does not need to be good at abstracting out code in Haskell to be happy and productive using Haskell. We need to be careful not to move on the goalposts on our beginners, it's deeply unfair and frustrating if we make them think they can't do anything at all until they can do it perfectly.
Posted by coolsunglasses on May 30, 2015, 10:29 PM
Tags
Related issues
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
- > steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
- Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
> our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Why is there no contact form?
I think you've got a point there that can be reinforced by looking at the ratio of Haskellers vs.
I think you've got a point there that can be reinforced by looking at the ratio of Haskellers vs. those comfortable with splitting things out to (.) or (>=>) Critically, however, one does not need to be good at abstracting out code in Haskell to be happy and productive using Haskell. We need to be careful not to move on the goalposts on our beginners, it's deeply unfair and frustrating if we make them think they can't do anything at all until they can do it perfectly.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.