If he wanted for the code to be available, though, he could give it to someone else (who doesn't work for a GPU company), and that person...
If he wanted for the code to be available, though, he could give it to someone else (who doesn't work for a GPU company), and that person would then release it (and would own the copyright). He would not gain more "reputation points" because his name wouldn't be linked to the project, but that would avoid for the code to be forgotten in the cellar while nobody cares.
Posted by idlewan on Aug 12, 2014, 10:16 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Not sure what you suggest to do.
- Why is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
Not sure what you suggest to do.
NewWhy is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
NewThe biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
If he wanted for the code to be available, though, he could give it to someone else (who doesn't work for a GPU company), and that person...
If he wanted for the code to be available, though, he could give it to someone else (who doesn't work for a GPU company), and that person would then release it (and would own the copyright). He would not gain more "reputation points" because his name wouldn't be linked to the project, but that would avoid for the code to be forgotten in the cellar while nobody cares.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.