IssueRaiser

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,500 issues0 comments

hackernews (Other)

In my opinion, no it really isn't.

im3w1lMay 30, 2014, 4:20 PM

In my opinion, no it really isn't. You can just create a method with a different name or a static constructing method if you need to overload constructors. The major pain point with generics is that they don't work with primitives.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue