IssueRaiser

> It's that implicit casts from void* are unnecessary in C++ Very well aware of the C++-head's answer to these problems.

> It's that implicit casts from void* are unnecessary in C++ Very well aware of the C++-head's answer to these problems. > My point is that the lack of implicit casts from void* should not be frustrating, This was a discussion about whether or not C++ is a superset of C. I wrote up the difference that frustrates me the most and all other comments were missing.

Posted by asveikau on Aug 1, 2015, 4:06 AM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments

hackernews (Other)

> It's that implicit casts from void* are unnecessary in C++ Very well aware of the C++-head's answer to these problems.

asveikauAug 1, 2015, 4:06 AM

> It's that implicit casts from void* are unnecessary in C++ Very well aware of the C++-head's answer to these problems. > My point is that the lack of implicit casts from void* should not be frustrating, This was a discussion about whether or not C++ is a superset of C. I wrote up the difference that frustrates me the most and all other comments were missing.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue