Java supports Runnable JARs.
Java supports Runnable JARs. This bundles all dependencies into the JAR so you can just run: java -jar foobar.jar And if it's a webapp, you can use something like Jersey so that the JAR itself if a webserver (launched from main function). And with Jersey+Grizzly you can make webapps that have zero XML config, btw. Java's SSL handling is definitely annoying, though. But I think it's better than how other languages do it which is to simply bypass cert validation. Also, I don't think it's fair to lump anything Android-related into complaints about Java. Google yoinked the Java syntax and the name and then added their own stack underneath. My main pain point with Java is dependency management and builds. I don't like any of the systems out there. After years of Ant, Ivy, and Maven, I've just resigned myself to using Eclipse and downloading JARs manually, storing them with the code. It's ugly but not as ugly as Maven.
Posted by logn on Jun 20, 2014, 10:31 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Not sure what you suggest to do.
- Why is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
Not sure what you suggest to do.
NewWhy is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
NewThe biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
Java supports Runnable JARs.
Java supports Runnable JARs. This bundles all dependencies into the JAR so you can just run: java -jar foobar.jar And if it's a webapp, you can use something like Jersey so that the JAR itself if a webserver (launched from main function). And with Jersey+Grizzly you can make webapps that have zero XML config, btw. Java's SSL handling is definitely annoying, though. But I think it's better than how other languages do it which is to simply bypass cert validation. Also, I don't think it's fair to lump anything Android-related into complaints about Java. Google yoinked the Java syntax and the name and then added their own stack underneath. My main pain point with Java is dependency management and builds. I don't like any of the systems out there. After years of Ant, Ivy, and Maven, I've just resigned myself to using Eclipse and downloading JARs manually, storing them with the code. It's ugly but not as ugly as Maven.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.