So far, it seems that a well-designed OO language can get you closer to the best of both worlds than if you start from ML-style functiona...
So far, it seems that a well-designed OO language can get you closer to the best of both worlds than if you start from ML-style functional languages. Consider that C# let's you have all three of your essentials: It doesn't have higher-kinded types, but it does have monad comprehensions (LINQ + SelectMany)… the special syntax is nice but not necessary. It has type classes in the form of implicit conversions. It has modules in the form of static classes. C# even lets you do Smalltalk-style OO without too much fuss. The biggest problem with C# and pethaps OO in general is the lack of intellectual curiosity.
Posted by noblethrasher on Nov 30, 2014, 5:25 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Not sure what you suggest to do.
- Why is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
Not sure what you suggest to do.
NewWhy is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
NewThe biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
So far, it seems that a well-designed OO language can get you closer to the best of both worlds than if you start from ML-style functiona...
So far, it seems that a well-designed OO language can get you closer to the best of both worlds than if you start from ML-style functional languages. Consider that C# let's you have all three of your essentials: It doesn't have higher-kinded types, but it does have monad comprehensions (LINQ + SelectMany)… the special syntax is nice but not necessary. It has type classes in the form of implicit conversions. It has modules in the form of static classes. C# even lets you do Smalltalk-style OO without too much fuss. The biggest problem with C# and pethaps OO in general is the lack of intellectual curiosity.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.