Thanks for saving me the trouble of reading it.
Thanks for saving me the trouble of reading it. I'd also suggest that one of the reasons people perceive the study of human behaviour as unscientific is that it so frequently is . Studies of human behaviour are inextricably bound up in politics. Many studies are designed, whether consciously or unconsciously on the part of the authors, to advance the authors' own political or social agenda. Even if you avoid that problem, many studies are just plain statistically lousy, and employ deeply non-random samples. And finally you've got the annoying problem that people know they're being studied and may modify their behaviour accordingly.
Posted by afafsd on Sep 4, 2014, 8:54 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Not sure what you suggest to do.
- Why is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
Not sure what you suggest to do.
NewWhy is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
NewThe biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
Thanks for saving me the trouble of reading it.
Thanks for saving me the trouble of reading it. I'd also suggest that one of the reasons people perceive the study of human behaviour as unscientific is that it so frequently is . Studies of human behaviour are inextricably bound up in politics. Many studies are designed, whether consciously or unconsciously on the part of the authors, to advance the authors' own political or social agenda. Even if you avoid that problem, many studies are just plain statistically lousy, and employ deeply non-random samples. And finally you've got the annoying problem that people know they're being studied and may modify their behaviour accordingly.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.