IssueRaiser

Thanks, it was an honest question.

Thanks, it was an honest question. I'll look into OBR10. Currently I'm at a small-ish startup and I have ~150 TB of data on a synology nas. It's in 2 raid groups, both raid 6. Seemed safe enough. edit Ah, right. From some reason I didn't make the connection that raid 10 was raid 0+1, it doesn't work for us simple because of the sheer amount of data we need to store. Also, although it would be a real bitch if we lost everything(like set us back a week+), most of the data is derived data, and we have all the raw data in cold storage, so we could eventually rebuild the array from scratch.

Posted by deeviant on Jun 24, 2015, 11:00 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,500 issues0 comments

hackernews (Other)

Thanks, it was an honest question.

deeviantJun 24, 2015, 11:00 PM

Thanks, it was an honest question. I'll look into OBR10. Currently I'm at a small-ish startup and I have ~150 TB of data on a synology nas. It's in 2 raid groups, both raid 6. Seemed safe enough. edit Ah, right. From some reason I didn't make the connection that raid 10 was raid 0+1, it doesn't work for us simple because of the sheer amount of data we need to store. Also, although it would be a real bitch if we lost everything(like set us back a week+), most of the data is derived data, and we have all the raw data in cold storage, so we could eventually rebuild the array from scratch.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue