> The obsession of git users with rewriting history has always puzzled me.
> The obsession of git users with rewriting history has always puzzled me. Editing draft commits is fine. Editing public commits is less fine. The problem is that git has no way to distinguish draft and public commits except by social convention. Mercurial Evolve actually enforces the separation between draft and public commits, and can also allow setting up servers where people can collaboratively edit draft commits. My talk about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OlDm3akbqg
Posted by jordigh on Jun 19, 2015, 3:38 PM
Tags
Related issues
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
- > steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
- Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
> our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Why is there no contact form?
> The obsession of git users with rewriting history has always puzzled me.
> The obsession of git users with rewriting history has always puzzled me. Editing draft commits is fine. Editing public commits is less fine. The problem is that git has no way to distinguish draft and public commits except by social convention. Mercurial Evolve actually enforces the separation between draft and public commits, and can also allow setting up servers where people can collaboratively edit draft commits. My talk about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OlDm3akbqg
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.