They don't need to prove it works, they only need to prove that it doesn't.
They don't need to prove it works, they only need to prove that it doesn't. That's related to how defenders need to close all the holes but hackers only need to find one to get in, proving that it doesn't work for a subset of the tests is enough to put a substantial hole in the boat. Proving that it works is a much harder problem that probably only Theranos is willing to finance.
Posted by jacquesm on Apr 26, 2015, 6:52 AM
Tags
Related issues
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
- > steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
- Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
> our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Why is there no contact form?
They don't need to prove it works, they only need to prove that it doesn't.
They don't need to prove it works, they only need to prove that it doesn't. That's related to how defenders need to close all the holes but hackers only need to find one to get in, proving that it doesn't work for a subset of the tests is enough to put a substantial hole in the boat. Proving that it works is a much harder problem that probably only Theranos is willing to finance.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.