This article is initially very well written and convincing.
This article is initially very well written and convincing. And it started to stress me out a little bit! Am I at great risk for having most of my wealth tied to the dollar? But taking a step back: It is making very strong predictions for a future state of what I would consider a chaotic system. As the author identifies as a Physicist and not a Psychic, why is there no mention of uncertainty? No mention of how you would test or refute the prediction? Looking at very selectively picked graphs is like reading tea leaves. If even just a few people read the article and change their investment strategy as a result you already affected the outcome.
Posted by starmole on Aug 3, 2025, 9:35 PM
Tags
Related issues
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
- > steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
- Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
- > our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
> our Git monorepo was developing an annoying problem Sentences like this are so common from people using monorepos that I am convinced ...
Why is there no contact form?
The biggest problem with plugging a generator into an outlet is you need a double ended cord.
This article is initially very well written and convincing.
This article is initially very well written and convincing. And it started to stress me out a little bit! Am I at great risk for having most of my wealth tied to the dollar? But taking a step back: It is making very strong predictions for a future state of what I would consider a chaotic system. As the author identifies as a Physicist and not a Psychic, why is there no mention of uncertainty? No mention of how you would test or refute the prediction? Looking at very selectively picked graphs is like reading tea leaves. If even just a few people read the article and change their investment strategy as a result you already affected the outcome.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.