Wouldn't it be better if the error details struct were stack allocated by the caller, rather than being a pointer type that has to be all...
Wouldn't it be better if the error details struct were stack allocated by the caller, rather than being a pointer type that has to be allocated by the error provider? I guess signal safety might not always be important, but it sure could be, and this mechanism doesn't work for that, right?
Posted by jamesaguilar on May 4, 2014, 5:54 AM
Tags
Related issues
- Not sure what you suggest to do.
- Why is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
- The biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
- The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
- (My comment is about detached houses).
- The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Other)
Not sure what you suggest to do.
NewWhy is this not yet published on the official website and why is there no CVE?
NewThe biggest problem with having an LLM do this, from what I've observed of at least frontier models, is that the way they are trained...
The biggest problem with MOND is that it was hand-crafted with additional parameters simply to fit the data.
(My comment is about detached houses).
The biggest problem with this is that I can't run my company's own internal benchmarks against this API, because they will be trained int...
> steer Claude away from over-engineering parts of the system in response to hypothetical concerns.
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image?
Wouldn't it be better if the error details struct were stack allocated by the caller, rather than being a pointer type that has to be all...
Wouldn't it be better if the error details struct were stack allocated by the caller, rather than being a pointer type that has to be allocated by the error provider? I guess signal safety might not always be important, but it sure could be, and this mechanism doesn't work for that, right?
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.