As with https, moving forward has a cost, but at some point, the cost of staying compatible with old protocols is higher.
As with https, moving forward has a cost, but at some point, the cost of staying compatible with old protocols is higher. Before the switch, you have to deal with training staff for the new tech. Once the switch starts happening, you need to train the staff to deal with the risks of keeping the old tech. For example, I find it easier to have an https-only web infrastructure. Too bad for old deprecated browsers who cannot support proper encryption (and therefore become a security risk for me, and a waste of time to support). Dual protocols (v4 and v6) take more time and money to manage. Initial training can be harsh. Some first-gen hardware was terrible. However, now that it's done, I can't wait to switch off IPv4.
Posted by mgbmtl on Dec 9, 2014, 2:12 PM
Tags
Related issues
- > The bigger problem is the legal system isn't a logical system, it's a social construct.
- As others pointed out, it's hard to say how much copyrighted material the model already contains in the weights.
- Hey all, this is the first time I'm really sharing this.
- its like owning a personal computer in 1986.
- Not at all, actually.
- A car battery with reduced range is still perfectly useable as a storage battery for a PV system.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
pricing (Other)
> The bigger problem is the legal system isn't a logical system, it's a social construct.
NewAs others pointed out, it's hard to say how much copyrighted material the model already contains in the weights.
NewHey all, this is the first time I'm really sharing this.
Newits like owning a personal computer in 1986.
Not at all, actually.
A car battery with reduced range is still perfectly useable as a storage battery for a PV system.
Here in Argentina we are in permanent summer time GMT-3 since a long time, but we should be in GMT-4.
You should do some basic research yourself.
As with https, moving forward has a cost, but at some point, the cost of staying compatible with old protocols is higher.
As with https, moving forward has a cost, but at some point, the cost of staying compatible with old protocols is higher. Before the switch, you have to deal with training staff for the new tech. Once the switch starts happening, you need to train the staff to deal with the risks of keeping the old tech. For example, I find it easier to have an https-only web infrastructure. Too bad for old deprecated browsers who cannot support proper encryption (and therefore become a security risk for me, and a waste of time to support). Dual protocols (v4 and v6) take more time and money to manage. Initial training can be harsh. Some first-gen hardware was terrible. However, now that it's done, I can't wait to switch off IPv4.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.