Does anyone honestly believe that the current administration which has: 1) doubled down on the Bush admins attack on the Fourth Amendment...

Does anyone honestly believe that the current administration which has: 1) doubled down on the Bush admins attack on the Fourth Amendment; 2) attacked the 1st Amendment directly (something even Bush/Ashcroft didn't do..) and 3) run what is an arguably similar program in its moral and ethical ambiguity(Drone strikes) to the interrogation techniques; would even think about going after the previous administration!?!? Give me a break, that's beyond laughable. This piece by the Times is about what you'd expect from an organization that has lost its grip on reality. What's worse is that people actually pay attention to the Times at this point. Sadly, what we lack in this country is an honest journalistic broker that can objectively communicate about the political realities we have in front of us and our shortcomings as a nation and an electorate. Here's the thing, all of us that vote (and those that don't), are responsible for the mess in D.C.. The people that inhabit the beltway are simply taking advantage of our apathy and incompetence as an electorate..nothing more, nothing less...it's up to us, as the electorate, to purge our government of the latent corruption and decay that has come to permeate that town. Until we take up that charge in a meaningful way, we can't even have a discussion about topics such as this, it's just a waste of time..

Posted by rdxm on Dec 22, 2014, 10:28 PM

Tags

• pricing (Other)

Related issues

• > The bigger problem is the legal system isn't a logical system, it's a social construct.
• As others pointed out, it's hard to say how much copyrighted material the model already contains in the weights.
• Hey all, this is the first time I'm really sharing this.
• its like owning a personal computer in 1986.
• Not at all, actually.
• A car battery with reduced range is still perfectly useable as a storage battery for a PV system.