There's a talk from Travis Kalanick recently on a podcast about this.
There's a talk from Travis Kalanick recently on a podcast about this. It talks about the advantages of a startup vs an incumbent. My read is if a startup competes on price, the incumbent has no choice but to first let them gain a bunch of market share. It's too expensive for the incumbents to compete on price because a no-name startup is doing it. So they'd have to let you get relevant enough for it to make sense to compete on that axis. I view it as a wedge to gain market share and later compete on something else.
Posted by vishnukool on Oct 12, 2026, 6:35 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Yeah, the plan is far too expensive for what it provides.
- Crashed demand after one of the big AI labs (probably Anthropic because they focus way too hard on expensive frontier models) become inso...
- /dev/random is much too expensive for this.
- Yeah, this always bugged me.
- A year ago, I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after...
- The weird thing about this product is that its biggest competitor is "an old ipad." I feel like most of their target customer base alread...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
pricing (Other)
Yeah, the plan is far too expensive for what it provides.
NewCrashed demand after one of the big AI labs (probably Anthropic because they focus way too hard on expensive frontier models) become inso...
New/dev/random is much too expensive for this.
Yeah, this always bugged me.
A year ago, I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after...
The weird thing about this product is that its biggest competitor is "an old ipad." I feel like most of their target customer base alread...
There's a talk from Travis Kalanick recently on a podcast about this.
>nobody ever bought German cars for their low prices, except the Beetle Huh?
There's a talk from Travis Kalanick recently on a podcast about this.
There's a talk from Travis Kalanick recently on a podcast about this. It talks about the advantages of a startup vs an incumbent. My read is if a startup competes on price, the incumbent has no choice but to first let them gain a bunch of market share. It's too expensive for the incumbents to compete on price because a no-name startup is doing it. So they'd have to let you get relevant enough for it to make sense to compete on that axis. I view it as a wedge to gain market share and later compete on something else.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.