This was very helpful and thanks for publishing.

This was very helpful and thanks for publishing. Right near the end you just touched upon what i think is an important topic (perhaps its own post) If you could chart it your first exposure to John's (or anyones) audience is probably 80% of the bang for the buck. Sponsoring again 4 to 6 months later really only exposes you to net new readers since your first exposure or those that missed your first exposure and/or weren't a good target then but are now. If John is charging the same amount for each sponsorship the pricing model is broken for both of you. It sounds like you're underpaying for the 1st one and overpaying for additional and vice a versa for John. In general it's just something worth noting for anyone who advertises via such distinct channels (Imagine if HN let you do the same thing how your traffic and sales would be impacted by the 1st time you were on the homepage for 8 hours vs if you did it again 3 months later)

Posted by jusben1369 on Jan 26, 2015, 7:00 PM

Tags

• pricing (Other)

Related issues

• its like owning a personal computer in 1986.
• Not at all, actually.
• A car battery with reduced range is still perfectly useable as a storage battery for a PV system.
• Here in Argentina we are in permanent summer time GMT-3 since a long time, but we should be in GMT-4.
• You should do some basic research yourself.
• Well, actually not.