IssueRaiser

We, in our modest way, continue to compete with S3 and Glacier for the purposes of online storage / offsite backups / cloud sto...

We, in our modest way, continue to compete with S3 and Glacier for the purposes of online storage / offsite backups / cloud storage. Last year (2014) we announced petabyte-scale offsite filesystems[1] that are price-competitive with S3/Glacier. In fact, we have for many years solved a pain point for (some) customers who run their infrastructure on S3: "my infrastructure is on S3, and my backups are on ... S3 ?" ... and our support of s3tools in our environment makes that very simple.[2] [1] UNIX based, runs on our ZFS platform with snapshots. [2] ssh user@rsync.net s3cmd get s3://rsync/mscdex.exe

Posted by rsync on Jan 13, 2015, 4:24 AM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.8,000 issues0 comments

pricing (Other)

We, in our modest way, continue to compete with S3 and Glacier for the purposes of online storage / offsite backups / cloud sto...

rsyncJan 13, 2015, 4:24 AM

We, in our modest way, continue to compete with S3 and Glacier for the purposes of online storage / offsite backups / cloud storage. Last year (2014) we announced petabyte-scale offsite filesystems[1] that are price-competitive with S3/Glacier. In fact, we have for many years solved a pain point for (some) customers who run their infrastructure on S3: "my infrastructure is on S3, and my backups are on ... S3 ?" ... and our support of s3tools in our environment makes that very simple.[2] [1] UNIX based, runs on our ZFS platform with snapshots. [2] ssh user@rsync.net s3cmd get s3://rsync/mscdex.exe

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue