You're missing an important fine point here: I am not advocating buying options.

You're missing an important fine point here: I am not advocating buying options. These strategies are selling options. So implied volatility and theta decay are your very best friends. This "options are too complex" language is just silly. Retail investing doesn't work as it's been taught! It underperforms the market and professional investors, and it doesn't have to. You don't have to run complex positions, selling a vertical spread is every bit as easy as buying stock (one transaction to open the position, one to close it, and sometimes you don't need to close it.) Anybody who wants to tell me options are risky has to explain this: Suppose you want to capture upside in, say, Amazon. Why is it riskier to sell a put spread or buy a call spread, in either case risking just a few hundred dollars, than it is to buy shares when just 25 will cost you $7500 or more? The fact that you mistook the value of theta decay and IV in my proposed scenario of selling a covered call makes me think you just don't understand some of these things. And that's not your fault, it's a huge fail IMO that the retail investor has had to learn the finer points of front load vs back load on some overpriced mutual fund but has been taught that options are scary. Again, I do not advocate for taking long option positions and I definitely think you should check out TastyTrade.com to learn a bit more about the philosophy.

Posted by encoderer on Oct 27, 2014, 2:15 AM

Tags

• pricing (Other)

Related issues

• > The bigger problem is the legal system isn't a logical system, it's a social construct.
• As others pointed out, it's hard to say how much copyrighted material the model already contains in the weights.
• Hey all, this is the first time I'm really sharing this.
• its like owning a personal computer in 1986.
• Not at all, actually.
• A car battery with reduced range is still perfectly useable as a storage battery for a PV system.